
Above: The New Jerusalem
Image in the Public Domain
And the Sea Was No More
MAY 11-13, 2023
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Collect:
Almighty and ever-living God,
you hold together all things in heaven and on earth.
In your great mercy, receive the prayers of all your children,
and give to all the world the Spirit of your truth and peace,
through Jesus Christ, our Savior and Lord,
who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and forever. Amen.
–Evangelical Lutheran Worship (2006), page 34
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Assigned Readings:
Genesis 6:5-22 (33rd Day)
Genesis 7:1-24 (34th Day)
Genesis 8:13-19 (35th Day)
Psalm 66:8-20 (All Days)
Acts 27:1-12 (33rd Day)
Acts 27:13-38 (34th Day)
John 14:27-29 (35th Day)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You let enemies ride over our heads;
we went through fire and water;
but you brought us into a place of refreshment.
–Psalm 66:12, Book of Common Worship (1993)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more.
–Revelation 21:1, Revised Standard Version–Second Catholic Edition (2002)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Water can be scary, for it has the potential to destroy much property and end lives. In much of the Bible water signifies chaos. The first creation myth (Genesis 1:1-2:4a), actually not as old as the one which follows it, depicts a watery chaos as the foundation of an ordered, flat earth with a dome over it. The lections from Genesis 6-8, being the union of of various texts (as evident in late Chapter 6 and early Chapter 7 with regard to the number of animals to take aboard the Ark), is a composite myth in which water is a force of divine destruction and recreation. And the water is something to fear in Acts 27. It is no accident that, in Revelation 21, the New Jerusalem has no sea; the city is free of chaos.
Professor Amy-Jill Levine, in her Teaching Company course, The Old Testament (2001), says that she does not like Noah. He, in the story, could have tried to save lives if he had argued with God, as Abraham did, she says. Maybe she has a valid point. It is certainly one nobody broached in my juvenile or adult Sunday School classes, for my first encounter with the idea came via DVD recently. Yet the story which the Biblical editor wanted us to hear was one of God’s covenant with Noah.
That theme of covenant fits well with the calm and confidence of St. Paul the Apostle en route to Rome. He had a legal case arising from preaching (Acts 21:27 forward). The Apostle had exercised his right as a Roman citizen to appeal directly to the Emperor (Acts 25:11). Yet Herod Agrippa II (reigned 50-100), a client ruler of the Roman Empire, had stated that the Apostle could have gone free if he had not appealed to the Emperor (Acts 26:32), who, unfortunately, was Nero. Anyhow, Paul’s calm and confidence during the storm on the Mediterranean Sea, with the danger on board the ship, came from a positive spiritual place.
That peace is the kind which Jesus bequeaths to us and which the world cannot give. That peace is the sort which enables one to remain properly–seemingly foolishly, to some–confident during daunting times. That peace carries one through the chaotic waters and the spiritual wilderness until one arrives at the New Jerusalem. That peace is available via grace.
KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR
DECEMBER 18, 2013 COMMON ERA
THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF ADVENT, YEAR A
THE FEAST OF MARC BOEGNER, ECUMENIST
THE FEAST OF DOROTHY SAYERS, NOVELIST
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://blogatheologica.wordpress.com/2014/01/20/and-the-sea-was-no-more/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

“Follow Me.”
May 26, 2023
++++++++++++++++++++
Acts 25:13-25 (Revised English Bible):
Some days later King Agrippa and Bernice arrived an Caesarea on a courtesy visit to Festus. They spent some time there, and during their stay Festus raised Paul’s case with the king.
There is a man here,
he said,
left in custody by Felix; and when I was in Jerusalem the chief priests and elders of the Jews brought a charge against him, demanding his condemnation. I replied that it was not Roman practice to hand a man over before he had been confronted with his accusers and given an opportunity of answering the charge. So when they had come here with me I lost no time, but took my seat in court the very next day and ordered the man to be brought before me. When his accusers rose to speak, they brought none of the charges I was expecting; they merely had certain points of religion, and about someone called Jesus, a dead man whom Paul alleged to be alive. Finding myself out of depth in such discussions, I asked if he was willing to go to Jerusalem an stand trial on these issues. But Paul appealed to be remanded in custody for his imperial majesty’s decision, and I ordered him to be detained until I could send him to the emperor.
Psalm 103:1-2, 19-22 (Revised English Bible):
Bless the LORD, my soul;
with all my being I bless his holy name.
Bless the LORD, my soul,
and forget none of his benefits.
The LORD has established his throne in heaven,
his kingly power over the whole world.
Bless the LORD, you his angels,
mighty in power, who do his bidding and obey his command.
Bless the LORD, all you his hosts;
his ministers who do his will.
Bless the LORD, all created things,
everywhere in his dominion.
Bless the LORD, my soul.
John 21:15-19 (Anchor Bible):
When they had eaten breakfast, Jesus addressed Simon Peter,
Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?
He said,
Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.
Jesus told him,
Then feed my lambs.
A second time Jesus repeated the question,
Simon, son of John, do you love me?
He said,
Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.
Jesus told him,
Then tend my sheep.
For the third time Jesus asked,
Simon, son of John, do you love me?
Peter was hurt because Jesus had asked for the third time,
Do you love me?
So he said to him,
Lord, you know everything; you know well that I love you.
Jesus told him,
Then feed my little sheep. Truly I assure you, when you were a young man, you used to fasten your own belt and set off for wherever you wished. But when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will fasten a belt around you and take you where you do not wish to go.
(What he said indicated the sort of death by which Peter was to glorify God.) After these words, Jesus told him,
Follow me
The Collect:
O loving Father, grant that your Church, being gathered by your Holy Spirit, may be dedicated more fully to your service, and live united in your love, according to your will; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.
+++++++++++++++++++
Peter had denied Jesus three times before the crucifixion. And he affirmed Jesus three times after the resurrection. Yet there is more taking place in the reading from the Johannine Gospel.
The verbs for “love” vary slightly in the Greek language. Commentaries I have consulted note this fact without assigning any significance to it, stating that these are synonyms, while noting that ancient and modern scholars have understood the different Greek words as being important. Anyhow, the first two times Jesus and Peter converse Jesus asks if Peter has agape love for him, and Peter replies that he has phileo love for Jesus. Agape is unconditional, sacrificial love–the kind of love God has for us. Agape comes from the agapan, which is what John uses in the text. (Agapan can mean “to prefer or to esteem.”) Phileo is friendship and affection, which indicates passion, not preference. The third time, however, Jesus asked if Peter had phileo love for him, and Peter replied that he had phileo love for Jesus.
So, if one assumes that differing Greek words indicate more than the use of synonyms, here is what the Johannine Gospel depicts. The first two times Jesus asked Peter, “Do you prefer me to fishing and fishing boats?” and Peter’s replies indicated passion in the sense of friendship and brotherly love. The third time, however, Jesus and Peter referred to phileo love.
Yet, as scholars of the Fourth Gospel indicate, that work uses agape (and its linguistic variations) and phileo (and its linguistic variations) interchangeably.
As a devotional exercise, however, I ask you, O reader, a spiritual question: Do you have mere affection for Jesus, or do you prefer him to the alternatives in your life? Follow the question wherever the Holy Spirit leads.
(Thanks to Father Raymond E. Brown’s commentary on John in sorting out Greek words, by the way.)
Both Peter and Paul became martyrs–Peter by crucifixion. Considering himself unworthy to die as Jesus did, he was crucified upside-down.
The account from Acts becomes more understandable if one knows who these people were. Herod Agrippa II was a client king within the Roman Empire. Think of the British rule in India through 1947; London ruled parts of the subcontinent directly and others through natives. Rome followed the same practice in the Holy Land. Herod Agrippa II (reigned 53-100) was a great-grandson of Herod the Great (d. 4 B.C.E.), who had ordered the infamous massacre of the Holy Innocents. Herod Agrippa II “ruled” part of his great-grandfather’s territory and was incestuous with Bernice, his sister, who went on to become the mistress of the Roman Emperor Titus (reigned 79-81). Also, this Herod appointed the high priest.
Festus was the new Roman governor of Judea. The author of Luke-Acts depicts him as a conscientious man who tried to follow the letter of the law, rule honorably, and clean up messes inherited from Felix, his predecessor. Paul did not convince either Festus or Herod Agrippa II of the rightness of his cause, but, as Herod observed, Paul could have been freed if he had not asserted his right as a Roman citizen to appeal to the Emperor, who, unfortunately, was Nero (reigned 54-68). (Yet Paul had a divine mandate to go to Rome.) At Rome Paul met his death by beheading, although Acts ends before that event.
Paul preferred Jesus to the alternatives in his life. And, at his end, so did Peter.
KRT
Published originally at SUNDRY THOUGHTS OF KENNETH RANDOLPH TAYLOR on April 9, 2010
http://blogatheologica.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/follow-me/
You must be logged in to post a comment.